Legal Opinion

Poland v. Arizona

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 5, 1986No. 85-5023PublishedCited by 327 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The question presented is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a further capital sentencing proceeding when, on appeal from a sentence of death, the reviewing court finds the evidence insufficient to support the only aggravating factor on which the sentencing judge relied, but does not find the evidence insufficient to support the death penalty.

I

In 1977 petitioners Patrick and Michael Poland, disguised as police officers, stopped a Purolator van that was making cash deliveries to various banks in northern Arizona. After removing some $281,000 in cash from the van, petitioners took the two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by327 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

322 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API