Legal Opinion

Lacey v. Van Royen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 10, 1970No. [No. 437, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In this case it is contended that a trial judge erred in concluding that a conveyance was fraudulent as to creditors, the defense, among others, being that actual title was in a mother-in-law and that only bare legal title was in the son-in-law alleged to have made the fraudulent conveyance. We shall affirm the action of the chancellor.

Appellants Robert H. Lacey, Jr. (Lacey) and Marianne K. Lacey are husband and wife. Mrs. Lacey is the daughter of appellant Rose F. Kelly. In 1957 a house and a lot in a subdivision known as “Springfield” in Montgomery County were conveyed to Lacey, his wife,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  2. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Fitch v. Double" U" Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Sands v. Church of the Ascension & Prince of PeaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Gray v. Harriet Lane Home for Invalid ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Van Royen v. LaceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Damazo v. WahbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Colandrea v. Colandrea (In Re Colandrea)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1982
  4. Neumeyer v. Crown Funding Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Levin v. LevinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API