Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Double" U" Sales Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 14, 1957No. [No. 103, October Term, 1956.]PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal from a decree holding that real estate was held under a resulting trust, but that a judgment was a valid lien against the property.

On December 2, 1955, Naomi Fitch, appellant, filed a bill of complaint against Double “U” Sales Corporation, appellee, in which she alleged substantially that formerly she owned a home, 6911 Proctman Avenue, in Baltimore. Her husband died and she had an opportunity to purchase certain property at 533 N. Curley Street in Baltimore City. Being a widow and without any available source of income she was unable to procure a mortgage on said property…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Manly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  3. Brenner v. PlittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. Carmine v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  5. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Savonis v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Biser v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Permanent Financial Corp. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API