Legal Opinion

Vagim v. Haslett Warehouse Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1933No. Docket No. 789PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an action in trover to recover damages for the conversion of certain prunes which plaintiff had delivered to defendant’s warehouseman for storage in the latter’s storehouse in Visalia, California. The case was tried before a jury and judgment was returned in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the -owner of certain prunes and entitled to their possession; that he demanded possession thereof from defendant but that the defendant refused and failed to deliver the prunes, and that the defendant unlawfully converted such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Atwood v. Southern California Ice Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Waterhouse-Wilcox Co. v. Betz & MabreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Scott's Valley Fruit Exchange v. Growers Refrigeration Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Staley v. McClurkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Union Oil Co. v. Mutual Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Chatterton v. BooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API