Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Southern California Ice Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1923No. Civ. No. 4059PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action of trover to recover damages for the conversion of certain boxes of apples which plaintiff had delivered to defendant, a warehouseman, for storage in the latter’s warehouse at San Bernardino. Judgment passed for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial—a nonappealable order.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the owner of the boxes of apples and entitled to their possession; that he demanded possession thereof from defendant hut that the latter failed and refused to deliver the same, and that defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bancroft Co. v. HaslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Municipal Bond Co. v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Wilson v. Crown Transfer & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. U Drive & Tour, Ltd. v. System Auto Parks, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API