Legal Opinion
Schenck v. City of Hudson Village
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 1, 1996No. 5:96-CV-1481PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
7. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance enacted by the City of Hudson Village (“the City”), arguing primarily that the ordinance violates the substantive due process rights of certain developers and real property owners. The ordinance, which became effective May 1, 1996, places a limit on the amount of zoning certificates the City will issue annually. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, asking the Court to order the City not to enforce the ordinance against developers of lots which have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mark Schenck v. The City of HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Mark Schenck v. The City of HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997