Legal Opinion
Mark Schenck v. The City of Hudson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1997No. 96-3881Published
1Opinion of the Court
114 F.3d 590
Mark SCHENCK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The CITY OF HUDSON, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 96-3881.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Feb. 6, 1997
Decided June 4, 1997.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug.
7, 1997.*
John W. Solomon, Brouse & McDowell; Nicholas T. George, Akron, OH; Mark A. Ferguson (briefed), and Timothy J. Grendell (argued), Taft, Stettinius & Holister, Cleveland, OH, for Planitiffs-Appellees.
John E. Gotherman; Malcolm C. Douglas (briefed), Columbus, OH; Robert E. Manley, Timothy M. Burke, Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook;…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.