Legal Opinion

Andrew-Bey v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 12, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-3885Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT ANDREW-BEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Civil Action No. 23-03885 (UNA) v. ) ) MERRICK B. GARLAND et al., ) ) Respondents. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, appearing pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). For the following reasons, the Court will grant the IFP application and dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction. Petitioner is incarcerated at Canaan U.S. Penitentiary in Waymart, Pennsylvania. The scribbled handwritten petition is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
Stokes v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
Williams v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.