General Motors Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, General Motors Corporation (“GM”), initiated this action to challenge denial of a protest seeking item 807.00, Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”), allowances for certain domestic automobile components exported for assembly. Plaintiff avers that Customs improperly withheld the tariff adjustments because all the item 807.00, TSUS, requirements were fulfilled.
Defendant maintains that GM’s petition for item 807.00, TSUS, treatment was properly denied because, in the course of the painting process, the American made components were substantially…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Rohm & Haas Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mast Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Baylis Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Govesan America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- General Motors Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992