Legal Opinion

E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 29, 1972No. 5487, C.A.D. 1078PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eici-i, Judge.

This appeal is from tbe decision and judgment of the Third Division of the Customs Court, 67 Cust. Ct. 226, C.D. 4278 (1971), overruling a protest against the classification of papermakers’ felts imported from Canada in 1966. There is no dispute about the rate of *41duty. The sole question on appeal1 is the amount upon which duty should be assessed. Appellant maintains, pursuant to item 807.00, TSUS, that the merchandise is classifiable as an “assembly” of American components, and should have been assessed with duty upon the value of the imported articles less the cost of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Baylis Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Miles v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Export Packers Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  4. Zwicker Knitting Mills v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. Samsonite Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API