Legal Opinion

Watson v. Firemen's Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 3, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

In this action to recover upon policies of fire insurance the question presented by the case as transferred is whether there was any evidence from which it could be found that the origin of the fire was a risk insured against. The cause of the fire was an explosion, resultant from pouring gasoline into an automobile tank, by the light of an ordinary kerosene lantern. In the original policies all use of gasoline within the buildings was prohibited. This, under our decisions, would put the risk outside the policies, whether the insured knew of the use or not. Badger v. Platts, 68 N. H. 222. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Liverpool & London Insurance v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Steffe v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Caron v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. McDowell & BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. Thompson v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Cartier v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  4. Welch v. Fitzgerald-Hicks Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. State v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API