Legal Opinion

State v. Lafferty

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2006No. 23772PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This case involves a claim of double jeopardy. After a jury acquitted Joseph Lafferty (Lafferty) of second-degree rape, the State of South Dakota charged him with third-degree rape. Both charges were based on the same alleged incident. The trial court concluded that the third-degree rape charge violated double jeopardy and dismissed the charge. The State appeals. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] The charges against Lafferty arose from allegations by T.T., a fifteen year-old female, that Lafferty sexually penetrated her on March 15, 2004. On March…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. MuhmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. GarzaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. ThomasonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API