Legal Opinion

L & a PRODUCTS v. McKEOWN

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1973No. Appeal, 936 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This substantively routine workmen’s compensation case took, at the last moment, an unusual turn.

The claimant, Frances M. McKeown, contends that she injured her back in the furtherance of the work of her employer, L & A Products, when on June 26, 1967 she either slipped, tripped, stumbled, or lost her bal anee causing injury to her back. The employer denied an accident and a referee dismissed the claim petition on the ground of no accident on July 8,1970. The claimant’s appeal was heard by the Workmen’s Compensation Board on October 7, 1970.

On December 31, 1971, all of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Wheeler v. National Nayle Grip Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Field v. Carson Valley SchoolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. L & A Products v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API