Legal Opinion
Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Ass'n v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 24, 1949No. 8588-WMPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, a nonprofit California corporation, and individuals comprising its board of directors, seek by this action “to enjoin, set aside, suspend and annul a certain report, requirement and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission.” Jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1336, formerly § 41(28).
Hearing and determination of the cause by “a district court of three judges” is required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2325, formerly § 47, and this court was accordingly designated by the Chief Judge of the Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2284.
The challenged…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Washington-Oregon Shippers Cooperative Ass'n v. SchumacherWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
- Freight Consolidators Cooperative, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Shippers Cooperative, Inc., a Corporation, and Pierson-Corn, Inc., a Corporation v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.