Legal Opinion

In re Hendrick

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 20, 1905No. 1,357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, District Judge.

The referee seems to have confused his functions. I have read the papers sent up to me pretty carefully, and I am unable to find that anything has transpired before him in the matter since March 2, 1905, which permitted him to avail himself of section 39 (5) of the bankrupt act, or authorized the bankrupt to ask him so to do. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 555 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3436], If such things can be done, hearings on discharges might become interminable.

Passing by the earlier entanglements which have cumbered this case, and which do not concern us now,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re SugarmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933
  2. In re WalderDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1907
  3. In re KrallDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1912
  4. In re RivkinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API