Legal Opinion

In re Krall

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 22, 1912No. 2,332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the bankruptcy proceedings of Morris Krall. On report of master sustaining exceptions to discharge.

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

It must long since have become obvious to those interested in our bankruptcy practice that this court will go far to compel regular, orderly, and lawful procedure on the part of its referees, whether they are acting in the direct performance of their statutory duties or as special masters. As expressive of such determination the cases of In re Peck (D. C.) 120 Fed. 972. In re Hendrick (D. C.) 138 Fed. 473, and In re Walder (D. C.) 152 Fed. 490, may be read with profit by the curious.

But let us turn our attention for a moment to the case in hand. The specifications of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re PeckDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1903
  2. In re HendrickDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re HillebrandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1930
  2. In the Matter of Ignatius A. Monforte, Bankrupt-Appellant. Chemical Bank New York Trust Company, Objecting Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API