Legal Opinion
Landmark Land Co. v. City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 2, 1986No. 84SA400, 84SA410, and 84SA413PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
These three cases, which were consolidated before trial, all involve challenges to section 10-62.5 of the Revised Municipal Code of the City and County of Denver (Code), which extended mountain view protection to Southmoor Park in 1982. The three appellants, Harsh Investment Corp., Landmark Land Company, Inc., and Southmoor Park Shopping, Inc., own land in the area affected by section 10-62.5. They brought suit against the City and County of Denver alleging substantive, procedural, and constitutional defects in the ordinance. The trial court, hearing the case without a jury,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Polygon Corp. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Town Council of New Harmony v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Finch v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Sundheim v. Board of Cty. Com'rs of Douglas Cty.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jafay v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.