Legal Opinion

Rennick v. Jackson & Coker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1989No. 87CV034; CA A47301PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

In this contract action in which plaintiffs allege that defendant breached its contract to locate a physician to work as their employe, the trial court awarded plaintiffs $13,000 as compensatory damages. Only two issues are raised on appeal: Whether the trial court erred in striking plaintiffs’ claim for lost profits and whether it abused its discretion in reducing the amount of attorney fees awarded to plaintiffs. We reverse.

The case was tried to the court. At the close of the evidence, defendant moved to “strike” plaintiffs’ claim for lost profits on the ground that plaintiffs’ evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas Construction Corp. v. Mazama Timber Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. VonRavensberg v. Houck-Carrow Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Husky Lumber Co. v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Bruer's Contract Cutting v. National Council On Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. In re the Marriage of KotlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Chalmers v. Concrete Bob, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API