Legal Opinion
Parramore v. Tru-Pak Moving Systems, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 1, 2003No. 1:06-m-00059PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
OSTEEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Richard Parramore and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company bring this action against Defendants Tru-Pak Moving Systems, Inc., d/b/a Isenhower Tru-Pak, Atlas Van Lines, Inc., John Sie-gel, and Kevin Franklin England. The claim involves damage done to a shipment of household goods during an interstate move. As such, the claim is governed by the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq., and specifically the Car-mack Amendment to that Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14706. In addition, Plaintiffs have asserted state law claims of negligence…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rehm v. Baltimore Storage Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2004
- Fanning v. The John A. Sheppard Memorial Ecological Reservation, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
- German v. Bekins Van Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Miracle of Life, L.L.C. v. North American Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- NOTASH v. TOTAL MILITARY MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025