Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. DiCristina

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1925No. 15362PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Since a State may' in its own courts, where no domestic policy is violated, enforce rights established by the laws of other sovereignties, there is ordinarily no valid reason why such rights may not be enforced in the courts of such State under the attachment laws against a nonresident of the State. Where the right sought to bo thus enforced against a nonresident arises solely under an act of Congress, and thereby by virtue of Eederal authority, it may nevertheless be enforced in the State cortrt by attachment, unless in so doing, on account of the Eederal government having jurisdiction…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. State Ex Rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. DiCristinaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API