State Ex Rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtDayid E. Blair, J.
This is an original proceeding in this .court, whereby, upon petition of relator, we issued our preliminary rule in prohibition against respondent as judge of Division One of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, commanding him to appear and show cause why he should not be prohibited from hearing or taking further cognizance of or action in a certain cause pending in Division One of said circuit court, wherein the American Fruit Growers (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) is plaintiff, and relator in this case is defendant.
The return of respondent is in effect a demurrer to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Varnville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Iowa National Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Angerman Co., Inc. v. Edgemon Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.