Legal Opinion

Association of Apartment Owners of Maalaea Kai, Inc. v. Stillson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2005No. 23932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold (1) Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 514C-6(a) requires lessees of condominium units to which 75% of the common interests are appurtenant to approve of a leased fee purchase, (2) because HRS § 514C-6(a) is silent on the method of calculating the votes of multi-owner units, the bylaws of an association of apartment owners may govern on how the votes are to be calculated so long as not violative of any law, (3) if any defects affected the approval process, the 75% requirement was satisfied by the lessees’ subsequent ratification of the previous vote when…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gold v. HarrisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Beamer v. NishikiHawaii Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. County of Hawaii v. UNIDEV, LLC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Schmidt v. Pacific Benefit Services, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. County of Hawai'i v. UniDev, LLCHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Kalima v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. UFJ Bank Ltd. v. IedaHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API