Legal Opinion

Village of St. Anthony v. Brandon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Fremont County. James M. Stevens, Judge. Judgment for. respondent, from which defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from District Court, Fremont County. James M. Stevens, Judge. Judgment for. respondent, from which defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. ■ Had the plaintiff, said board of trustees, power or right to enact that portion of said ordinance making it unlawful to carry on, or allow to be carried on, any other business in the same room wherein intoxicating liquors are sold? We are aware that, under the provisions of section 1916 of the Political Code of Idaho, and especially subdivision 15 thereof, the village trustees have the right to license, regulate and prohibit the…

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKSLAGER, J. —

This case was submitted to the lower court on an agreed statement of facts, to wit:

*2081. That the plaintiff, the village of St. Anthony, is a municipal corporation duly and regularly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Idaho, and is a village, and situated in Fremont county, in the state of Idaho; that M. E. Jamison, B. C. Bowers, W. C. Yager, W. W. Yoe-mans and J. L. Pratt are the duly qualified and acting board of trustees of the village of St. Anthony; that M. E. Jamison, is the duly qualified and acting chairman of the board of trustees, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. City of Cairo v. FeuchterIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Robinson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CallowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Territory v. DonderoHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Clyde v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Best v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API