State v. Scott
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether certain statements by the prosecutor in his closing argument to the jury resulted in reversible error. We conclude that they did and that the defendant must receive a new trial.
All of the charges for which the defendant was convicted arose from one fatal traffic accident. The defendant was indicted, pled not guilty, and was convicted by a jury for the felony of involuntary manslaughter and the misdemeanors of driving under the influence of alcohol and driving too fast for existing conditions. The trial court entered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.