Gill v. Whiteside-Hemby Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
GriffiN Smith;, C. J.
We determine whether certain instructions given at appellee’s request were erroneous, and whether it was prejudicial for the trial court to hold that counsel for appellant should not interrogate prospective jurors as to insurance affiliations.
Appellant, plaintiff below, was struck by a motorcycle. He was attempting to cross Victory street (in Little Rock) in front of a street car. The motorcycle was being operated by Victor Wild, who had a companion with him. Wild was making a business trip for appellee. When the accident occurred, the street car was about two-thirds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pekin Stave & Manufacturing Co. v. RameySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Williams v. CantwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Cooper v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Ward v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rogers v. StillmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Dedmon v. ThalheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Wright v. CoveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Harvey v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Riggan v. LangleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.