Legal Opinion

Riggan v. Langley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 1964No. 5-3373PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

The appellants, Tommy Riggan and his father, James A. Riggan, brought this action against the appellee, P. J. Langley, for the recovery of damages resulting from an automobile collision. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the appellee. For reversal of this judgment the appellants first contend that the court erred in permitting the introduction of pictures of the roadway where the accident occurred. Appellants'argue that the pictures were inadmissible because they were taken a year after the accident and at a time when the conditions of the road…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGeorge Contracting Co. v. MizellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Bussell v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Southern National Insurance Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Wright v. CoveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Home Co. v. LammersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. NuckollsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Brockwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Hill Construction Co. v. BraggSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Home Insurance v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API