Legal Opinion
United Co. v. Meehan
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 16, 1999No. 97-P-418PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
United Company (United), the owner of a *316residential development in Boston known as Church Park, brought two summary process actions which were consolidated for trial. One was an action against George Meehan, a tenant under lease since 1988, and the second was against Valerie Shaw, a frequent visitor to Meehan’s apartment.
After a jury-waived trial, a judge of the Housing Court issued careful and detailed findings, ordered that Meehan’s tenancy not be forfeited if he complied with certain conditions — in effect giving Meehan an opportunity to request, in accordance with the rules and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Hodge v. KlugMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Attorney General v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSBMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Shea v. Neponset River Marine & Sportfishing, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Mulvanity v. PelletierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cummings Properties, LLC v. Cepoint Networks, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Panagakos v. CollinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- K & S Development Trust v. KeithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
- South Boston Elderly Residences, Inc. v. MoynahanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Thorup v. HodgesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018