Legal Opinion

Cummings Properties, LLC v. Cepoint Networks, LLC

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 19, 2010No. 10-P-189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

The issue presented is whether a guarantor, with no right to possession, is a proper defendant in a summary process action. The Appellate Division of the District Court Department affirmed a judgment that dismissed such a guarantor from a summary process proceeding. We affirm.

Background. The facts are undisputed. In September, 2008, plaintiff Cummings Properties, LLC (Cummings), as lessor, and defendant Cepoint Networks, LLC (Cepoint), executed a five-year commercial lease (to begin October 1, 2008) for a portion of property located at 175-N New Boston Street, Woburn. *288Defendant Bernard Adama…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haddad v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. McLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Fafard v. Lincoln Pharmacy of Milford, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Cummings v. WajdaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Panagakos v. CollinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  2. Loring Towers Associates v. FurtickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  3. Cedar-Fieldstone Marketplace, LP v. T.S. Fitness, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. Thorup v. HodgesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API