Legal Opinion

Shea v. Neponset River Marine & Sportfishing, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 13, 1982PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

The single issue on this appeal is whether a plaintiff who chooses to bring a summary process action in a District Court, seeking both possession and rent in excess of $7,500, can appeal an adverse decision to the Superior Court and relitigate in a jury trial the issues decided by the District Court. The action before us was initiated when the plaintiffs-landlords (Sheas) filed a summary process action against the defendant-tenant (Neponset) 2 in the Dorchester Divi sion of the District Court Department. The complaint alleged that Neponset was occupying certain property consisting of vacant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Chatham Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Universal Optical Corp. v. Globe Optical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Henderson v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. Greyhound Real Estate Finance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Jones v. MannsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Cranberry Realty & Mortgage Co. v. Ackerley Communications, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Fusaro v. BlakelyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Mulvanity v. PelletierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API