Shea v. Neponset River Marine & Sportfishing, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.
The single issue on this appeal is whether a plaintiff who chooses to bring a summary process action in a District Court, seeking both possession and rent in excess of $7,500, can appeal an adverse decision to the Superior Court and relitigate in a jury trial the issues decided by the District Court. The action before us was initiated when the plaintiffs-landlords (Sheas) filed a summary process action against the defendant-tenant (Neponset) 2 in the Dorchester Divi sion of the District Court Department. The complaint alleged that Neponset was occupying certain property consisting of vacant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Boston v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Chatham Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Universal Optical Corp. v. Globe Optical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Henderson v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bartlett v. Greyhound Real Estate Finance Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Jones v. MannsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Cranberry Realty & Mortgage Co. v. Ackerley Communications, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Fusaro v. BlakelyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Mulvanity v. PelletierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.