Legal Opinion
Carlton v. Babbitt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 28, 1998No. Civil Action Nos. 93-1174 (PLF), 93-1788 (PLF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This case is back before the Court on two related matters: (1) the plaintiffs’ motion to supplement the administrative record and (2) the plaintiffs’ challenge to the defendants’ decision on remand not to reclassify the Selkirk population of grizzly bears from “threatened” to “endangered” under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq.
In 1995, this Court found that the government’s refusal to reclassify the Selkirk population as “endangered” was arbitrary and capricious and not supported by the evidence in the record. Carlton v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Rivers v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Oceana, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Ad Hoc Metals Coalition v. WhitmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Fund for Animals v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.