Legal Opinion
Ad Hoc Metals Coalition v. Whitman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 26, 2002No. CIV.A.01-0766(PLF). No. CIV.A.01-0900(PLF)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ad Hoc Metals Coalition and National Federation of Independent Business brought these actions pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702, seeking judicial review of a final rule. promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency that lowered the reporting thresholds for lead and lead compounds. The Court has before it a motion by plaintiffs to supplement the administrative record with extra-record documents, alleging that the record certified by EPA on August 31, 2001 is an incomplete record on the rule at issue.
I.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fund for Animals v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Maritel, Inc. v. CollinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Joint Venture of Comint Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.