Legal Opinion

Bell v. Riley Bus Lines

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 13, 1952No. 4 Div. 649PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appellant sued Riley Bus Lines; Riley Bus Lines, a corporation; Isaac Riley and Sarah Riley, doing business as Riley Bus Lines; and Herrington Motor Company and Truck Lines and Wallace Herrington doing business as Herrington Motor Company and. Truck Lines, for wrongfully causing the death of her intestate, basing her right to sue on § 123, Title 7, Code of 1940, commonly referred to as “The Homicide Act.”

The complaint consisted of two counts. Count One claimed $25,000 as damages for that “on heretofore, on the 2nd day of September, 1950, the Plaintiff’s intestate, Howard…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Savannah & Memphis Railroad v. ShearerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Steenhuis v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Breed v. Atlanta, B. C. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Black Belt Wood Co., Inc. v. SessionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Tatum v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Campbell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Anderson v. KempSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Carter v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API