Legal Opinion

City of Huntingburgh v. First

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1896No. 1,870PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Dubois Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellee sued and recovered judgment against the appellant, for personal injuries received by her while passing over a sidewalk in said city, which she alleges was unsafe and defective. The complaint is in three paragraphs, in substance alike, to each of which the appellant filed a demurrer, which was overruled and exceptions saved.

The demurrer was addressed separately to each paragraph of the complaint, hence was several in its character, a.nd the same as if three separate demurrers had been filed, one to each paragraph. The *553first specification of error assigned is joint, and questions a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Town of Gosport v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. City of Indianapolis v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PinchinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. LeachmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Logansport v. GammillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. City of Michigan City v. RudolphIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. City of Terre Haute v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. City of Linton v. MaddoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API