Legal Opinion
Griego v. Los Angeles Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 1994No. B072710PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), J.
Plaintiff and appellant Ophra Griego sought a writ of ordinary mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) to compel defendants and respondents Los Angeles Unified School District et al. (District) to classify her as a permanent employee. The trial court denied the writ, concluding on undisputed facts that as a matter of law Griego did not meet the statutory qualifications for permanent status (Ed. Code, § 44929.21, subd. (b)), 1 and, therefore, District had no clear and present ministerial duty to classify Griego as permanent.
This appeal from the judgment involves only a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Rodriguez v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sherman v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Cousins v. Weaverville Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Cox v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Petersil v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013