Legal Opinion

Cox v. Los Angeles Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 2013No. B239693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEESEMAN, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Erica Cox appeals an order denying her petition for writ of mandate. She sought to compel respondent Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) to classify her as one of its permanent employees, effective July 1, 2009, and to provide her with appropriate pay and benefits. We agree with the trial court’s analysis and ruling. We therefore will affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

With a seniority date of March 12, 2009, Cox became a probationary counselor at Crenshaw High School (Crenshaw), with a normal workday of six hours. After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zhou v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Vittal v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Alberda v. Board of Retirement of Fresno County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Hunt v. Alum Rock Union Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Griego v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Temecula Valley Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Hayes v. Temecula Valley Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Kracke v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API