Legal Opinion

McKay v. Longsworth

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1989No. B041921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GATES, J.

Despite our earlier observations, the appellate department of the Los Angeles superior court persists in certifying that its decisions meet the standards for publication (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 976(b)) even after having ruled those self-same decisions contain no issues meriting certification. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 63.) Therefore, our comments in Beizer v. Financial Savings & Loan Assn. (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 133, 134-135 [218 Cal.Rptr. 143], are equally apposite here: “. . . Thus deprived of (1) a statement of the question or questions believed to require resolution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Norton v. HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Beizer v. Financial Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API