Legal Opinion
Beizer v. Financial Savings & Loan Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1985No. B014452PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GATES, J.
Proceeding under rule 62(a) of the California Rules of Court, on our motion we ordered this matter transferred when the Appellate Department of the Los Angeles Superior Court certified for publication a decision that suggested it was founded upon a record sufficient to permit an important and novel issue of law to be definitively resolved.
Some years ago this appellate department abandoned its former practice of first certifying its decisions to us for consideration prior to directing their publication. Thus deprived of (1) a statement of the question or questions believed to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. Kathy P.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Paskas v. Illini Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Forbes v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Herian v. Southeast Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Peters v. PetersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- McKay v. LongsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ford v. National Credit Union AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Peters v. PetersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.