Legal Opinion

W & H GRAPHICS, INC. v. Hamby

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1980No. 7925SC834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ Claims For Relief

The judgment entered 14 March 1979 was based upon the granting of plaintiff Winkler’s motion at the close of trial to amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence and seek involuntary dissolution of the corporation pursuant to G.S. 55-125. The validity of that judgment as to plaintiffs’ claims for relief depends upon whether the motion to amend was properly granted. We hold that it was not.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(b) provides in part:

Amendments to conform to the evidence. — When issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by the express or implied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Dowd v. Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Meiselman v. MeiselmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. J. M. Westall & Co. v. Windswept View of Asheville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Hill v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API