Legal Opinion

Williams v. De Baca

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1938No. 5160PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

We adopt the agreed designation of the parties to this appeal, and appellant, Williams, will be referred to hereafter as plaintiff, appellee De Baca as defendant, and ap-pellee Regional Agricultural Credit Corporation as the Corporation.

Plaintiff instituted this suit in the district court of Bowie county February 18/1935, against defendant and the Corporation for damages occasioned by the alleged breach of the following contract:

“This memorandum of agreement made at Clarksville, Texas, this 26th day of November, 1934;
“Witnesseth; that the pasture known as the Hudson pasture and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gunter & Summerfield v. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Houston Nat. Exch. Bank of Houston v. De BlancCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Blalack & Son v. San Antonio Cattle Loan Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hindes v. LockTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. ChristmasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Eaton v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Stephen Zarate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. in the Interest of M.B., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. in the Interest of M.B., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API