Legal Opinion
Grenier v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 17, 2004No. 02-P-319PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
Having been denied a residential building permit
as well as a permit to build a house and raised septic system on a parcel of land situated in Chatham, the plaintiffs sought review *63of the actions of the zoning board of appeals of Chatham (board) and the conservation commission of Chatham (commission) as well as a declaration that the defendants’ actions constitute an unconstitutional taking of the property in dispute without just compensation. A Superior Court judge affirmed the decisions of the board and the commission and concluded that, on the facts found, the governmental action challenged…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gove v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Andrews v. Town of AmherstMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Richard M. Young, Jr. A/K/A Richard Young v. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, John Silovsky as Wildlife Division Director of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
- The Commons of Lake Houston, Ltd. v. City of Houston, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2025