Legal Opinion

State v. Silver Bow Refining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1928No. 6,352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against the defendant on the pleadings. The complaint has been held sufficient. (State v. Silver Bow Refining Co., 78 Mont. 1, 252 Pac. 301.) The question now is as to the sufficiency of the answer.

The defendant is a distributor of gasoline within the purview of section 2381, Revised Codes 1921.

■Section 2382, as amended by Chapter 186 of the 1925 Session Laws (page 359), provides in part that every distributor shall pay to the state treasurer for each year a license tax for engaging in and carrying on his business in this state in an amount equal to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sonneborn Brothers v. CuretonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Hale v. County Treasurer of Mineral Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. Silver Bow Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Fulton Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Richardson v. LloydMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nelson v. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API