Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Lloyd

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1931No. 6,753PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an. appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on a promissory note in the sum of $1,000, with interest and attorney’s fees.

The complaint is in the usual form, from which it appears that the note was made to the St. Paul Trust & Savings Bank, and by it sold to plaintiff before maturity. The answer, so far as material here, alleges that the note is secured by a real estate mortgage executed contemporaneously with the note; that the real estate included in the mortgage is of the reasonable value of $2,000, and is unimpaired, except that delinquent taxes against the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Savings Bank v. AlbertsonMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Great Falls v. JeffriesMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Horsky v. McKennanMontana Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Rist v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sanborn v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Northwestern Improvement Co. v. LowryMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Leffek v. LuedemanMontana Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API