May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.
In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md.App. 1, 34, 703 A.2d 1315, cert. denied, 349 Md. 494, 709 A.2d 139 (1998), this Court held that an automobile manufacturer could not be held hable in tort for faffing to warn of the latent dangers of asbestos-containing replacement parts that it neither manufactured nor placed into the stream of commerce. In this case, we reaffirm that decision and, in accordance with a number of out-of-state cases that have followed in its wake, hold that the manufacturers of steam pumps in Navy ships cannot be held liable for failing to warn of the dangers of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Schwartz v. Abex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015