Legal Opinion · Dissent

May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 18, 2015No. 5/15Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

WATTS, J.,

which BATTAGLIA, J., joins.

Respectfully, I dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals. In this case, Petitioner contends that, in a products liability case, a manufacturer may be liable for an individual’s injuries caused by a third party’s replacement parts; and Petitioner points out that other jurisdictions have held that there is a duty to warn in such circumstances.

Respondents respond that they are not liable in tort for any injury caused by exposure to asbestos from other manufacturers’ products; i.e., Respondents cannot be held…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Moran v. Fabergé, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API