State v. Jones
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
The defendant was convicted in a trial to the court of the crime of lascivious carriage in violation of § 53-219 of the General Statutes and has appealed on the ground that on all the evidence he should not have been found guilty of the charge. *699He has also assigned error in the conclusions stated in the court’s finding. However, since his rights will be completely protected by the comprehensive inquiry required by the general assignment of error in the conclusion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, it will not be necessary to consider the error addressed to the finding. State v. Pundy, 147…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Zeiner v. ZeinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1811
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State in Interest of LGWUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MalenaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- City of Seattle v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Seattle v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State in Interest of LGWUtah Supreme Court · 1982