Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Seattle v. Buchanan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1978No. 44199Published

1DissentUtter, J.

(dissenting) — I cannot agree with the majority. It applies general rules which have no application in the context of the facts in this case and misconstrues the cases it cites as supporting its conclusions. The facts presented do not constitute a crime under any reasonable interpretation of the ordinance in question. The City of Seattle has the power to enact an ordinance prohibiting public nudity. *611It must exercise its power, however, through an ordinance which does not discriminate or arbitrarily exaggerate the severity of the crime. It is not the definition found in the dictionary of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Chesebrough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Central Television Service, Inc. v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API