Legal Opinion

Hope v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1981No. Civ. 47841PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

In Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc. (1981) 28 Cal.3d 807 [171 Cal.Rptr. 604, 623 P.2d 165], the California Supreme Court es tablished certain guidelines for determining when an arbitration agreement constitutes an unenforceable contract of adhesion. In this proceeding we are called upon to apply those guidelines to contracts of employment between a securities brokerage firm and two of its account executives, calling for settlement of a broad range of disputes through arbitration procedures prescribed in the constitution and rules of the New York Stock Exchange. We shall hold that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Lewsadder v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Dryer v. Los Angeles RamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Izzi v. Mesquite Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API