Legal Opinion
Airtrans, Inc. v. Mead
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2004No. 02-6411PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
389 F.3d 594
AIRTRANS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kenneth MEAD, individually and in his capacity as Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation; Joseph Zschiesche, Special Agent, Office of Inspector General; Jeff Holt, Dyer County Sheriff; Larry Bell, Captain, Dyer County Sheriff's Department;
Dyer County, Tennessee; Samsung International, Inc.; U.S. Logistics Inc.; and Christopher Asworth, Esq., Defendants-Appellees,
United States of America, Intervenor,
Four Unnamed Agents of the Tennessee Department of Transportation; Jimmy Porter, Dyer County Investigator Sheriff's Department,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Russo v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Computer Leasco, Inc. v. NTP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Jackson, Tennessee Hospital Co. v. West Tennessee Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Atkins v. CoreCivic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Barnes v. Capital One Financial CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Hart v. GranadoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024