Sapp v. Davids
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The attorneys originally founded their claim on an express or special contract of employment. The contract *267was entire, and not severable. Their claim for recovery was later amended by adding a claim based upon quantum meruit. This amendment did not constitute a separate count. It did not strike from the case the allegation of the special contract. Upon the contrary it expressly insisted that the attorneys were entitled to compensation based upon the express or special contract. It prayed, however, that “in the event the contract of employment is held to be campertous, then plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gay v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Gowen v. New Orleans Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Meeks v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Johnson v. HiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hodges v. Community Loan & Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Remediation Services, Inc. v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Cahoon v. WillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Callahan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.