Legal Opinion
Cahoon v. Wills
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 21, 1934No. Nos. 9966, 9967PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
There are a main bill of exceptions, a cross-bill, and a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the main bill of exceptions. It is not necessary to pass on the questions presented by the main bill or the motion to dismiss, because the entire controversy is settled by a decision of the question raised in the cross-bill. Sapp v. Davids, 176 Ga. 265 (168 S. E. 62, 85 A. L. R. 1361), and cit.
Cahoon and others sought an injunction against Wills and others. Demurrers to the petition were filed. On June 28, 1933, the trial court entered an order reciting that “the defendants’ demurrers are hereby…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Berrien County Bank v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Kellam v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Grogan v. DeraneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hurt Building Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Deen v. Baxley State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Lawson v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Cofer v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- DAVISON-PAXON COMPANY v. BurkartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.